Troublesome PGL RMR Open Qualifers
The inaugural CS2 PGL RMR Open Qualifiers for the Copenhagen Major have encountered a multitude of issues. This analysis explores strategies to navigate the complexities of the new era of open brackets and concealed identities.
Counter-Strike esports thrives on an open circuit model, yet the current dominance of seasonal circuits like ESL Pro League and BLAST Premier poses challenges. The 2024 tournament landscape involves cutthroat deals, betting company partnerships, and organizations striving to stay afloat amidst the competitive esports winter.
Valve’s decision to entrust the CS2 Major to PGL is seen as a subtle challenge to corporate giants ESL/BLAST, emphasizing an open philosophy. Valve, known for their reclusive nature, occasionally communicates their libertarian and decentralized approach, both casually and competitively. However, their stoic communication style and detachment from drama leave the community at a loss for words.
The PGL RMR Open Qualifiers for the Copenhagen Major, particularly in Europe and Asia, have experienced significant chaos. Issues include the deployment of Akros Anti-Cheat causing PC problems, scheduling conflicts across regions, the challenge of BO1 matches in the new MR12 format, and a surge in cheating accusations leading to manual bans.
The worst aspect of these qualifiers was the flurry of cheating accusations, culminating in bans for various players and teams. This raised concerns about the integrity of CS2 and prompted discussions among fans and public figures. Even Akros themselves, in a now-deleted tweet, claimed that cheating in CS2 was “out of control.”
Possible Solutions for RMR Open Qualifiers
Cheating in CS2 is considered a severe offense, destroying competitive integrity and jeopardizing careers. We have faced specific cheating instances at highest CS level, but proving cheating without detection by anti-cheat systems like VAC is impossible. Cheating in Counter-Strike is destroying CS Betting and CS Gambling experience aswell.
Valve’s perceived lack of urgency in addressing the cheating issue prompts speculation. Potential reasons, such as resource allocation or conspiracies are justified. Soon, there will come point when they will have to come up with a solution.
Amidst concerns over cheating in online open qualifiers, proposed solutions include stricter measures. Alejandro “mopoz” Fernández-Quejo Cano suggests a structure similar to real sports, advocating for the submission of national identity documents to play. One the one side there are privacy concerns but some emphasizes the need for accountability.
The idea of “screened” brackets for professional teams, filtering out unknown teams is discussed but unlikely to align with Valve’s philosophy of open qualifiers. Concerns about favoritism and corruption are raised, leading to the rejection of this proposal.
In conclusion, we acknowledge the messy state of open qualifiers. Nevertheless, proposes such as submission of national identity documents are out of a question. The frustration within the CS2 community is palpable, emphasizing the need for more decisive measures. Inappropriate behavior could be counteracted but only without neglect from Valve.
Source: HLTV
